Radwan report highlights potential problems for investment firms
BRUSSELS
-- Member of the European Parliament Alexander Radwan released another working draft of his report to the EU Parliament in late May, and presented the report to the Committee on Economic and Monetary affairs. In the report, Radwan draws the committee’s attention to some key op risk issues.Increases in capital
For example, in the EU, the Basel II proposals are going to be effectively applied to the asset management community as well as banks through the third capital adequacy directive (Cad3). The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s third quantitative impact study (QIS3) showed large increases in regulatory capital due to the size of the op risk charge for investment firms.
"There are cases where the requirement to cover risks by own capital is neither reasonable nor helpful, but would just lead to further consolidation in the financial services industry. In some member states there are thousands of small investment firms, which do not come into possession of money or instruments of clients (eg, investment advisers, certain portfolio managers). Their risks are best covered by insurance," says Radwan in his paper.
"One big group who have a lot of concerns is the investment banks. They have started lobbying. The main point is that they say how they will have to calculate operational risk, the charge is too high for them," he says. "We’ve noted this, and we need to look for the reasons. If there is no reason for it that is sensible, then we will say to the commission that it is too high and should be reduced."
Smaller banking institutions
"Obviously this [charge] is going to be a big pill to swallow for the European asset managers," says Christian Pedersen, a consultant at Oliver Wyman in London "They’ve lobbied a lot but seemingly it has not been completely heard, so they are going to have to brace themselves for improving risk management, an area that they probably haven’t focused that much upon."
Radwan says he will also be looking at the impact of the operational risk capital charge on smaller banking institutions, and more specialised banks, through a more detailed study of the QIS 3 results.
Other areas of concern, according to Radwan, include the differences in scope of implementation between the EU and the US, and the introduction of the Lamfalussy process for legislation (Cad3 is the first piece of financial legislation to be structured into a main body of fixed principles, and a series of more flexible annexes packed with technical detail).
Radwan says he awaits the release of the next draft of the Cad3 in early June, and he will be presenting his final report for adoption of the committee before the EU parliament’s summer break. "We have to see if they move or not in the Commission on the points that are important to us," he says. OpRisk
Ellen Leander/Joseph Radford
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US