Jardine Fleming's Rogue Trader Scandal: Time Line
1970: Jardine Fleming Holdings of Hong Kong formed from two shareholders, Robert Fleming Holdings of London and Jardine Matheson, one of Hong Kong's business empires.
1982: Colin Armstrong, described in press reports as "an aggressive and successful trader", joins Jardine Fleming from Scottish Equitable.
1993: Revenues soar at Jardine Fleming's Hong Kong trading operations. Managers focus on expanding the business yet further.
December 1993: Robert Thomas, chief executive of Jardine Fleming Asset Management and Jardine Fleming Investment Management is informed that dealing procedures and controls are inadequate, although no improprieties are known.
1994: Armstrong works on managing three highly successful funds for Jardine Fleming. The expands so rapidly that its compliance procedures are overwhelmed. A ten-week ban on new business is put in place at the fund manager.
October 1994: A compliance officer from Robert Fleming is sent to Jardine Fleming in Hong Kong to improve compliance procedures there.
1995: Jardine Fleming's Hong Kong fund management division returns one of the worst financial performances in the company's history.
September 1995: After months of monitoring Armstrong's personal accounts, his irregular trades are brought to the attention of senior management.
Robert Fleming reports a compliance procedures problem to the UK's Investment Management Regulatory Organisation (Imro).
The parent company fails to recognize the full extent of Armstrong's improprieties, however.
November 1995: In response to the reported problems, Imro begins its investigation into Jardine Fleming's Hong Kong compliance operations.
January 1996: As the investigation deepens, Imro drafts in help from Hong Kong's Securities & Futures Commission (SFC). The full extent of Armstrong's activities are brought to light.
March 1996: Armstrong is "asked to resign" by Jardine Fleming's senior management.
September 1996: Jardine Fleming pays £12.4 million pounds to the disadvantaged funds, together with a £700,000 penalty fine. Thomas accepts responsibility for the compliance failures and has his trading licence revoked.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026