Moody’s backtracks on bank ratings
Following criticism over the use of Joint Default Analysis (JDA) in calculating its bank ratings, New York-based Moody’s Investors Service will review the practice.
Chris Mahoney, chairman of Moody’s credit policy committee, said: “In our initial application of JDA to banks, some rating outcomes were heavily dependent on high external support assumptions.” He added those in the market desired ratings with “more emphasis on intrinsic credit fundamentals”.
A slew of controversy followed recent upgrades made to some bank ratings under JDA, most notably the re-rating of some Icelandic banks to Aaa. Fresh changes to the way in which Moody’s works out bank ratings and notches for bank issuance will be published by March 30. They will be applied to ratings that have been affected in North America, Central Europe and the Nordic, Benelux and Baltic states by April 10. Many of the banks whose ratings were upgraded are now likely to see them fall.
Moody’s will publish a revised schedule for JDA implementation elsewhere when the revised methodology is released. The agency expects to finish its programme of reviewing all bank ratings by May 18.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market players warn against European repo clearing mandate
Regulators urged to await outcome of US mandate and be wary of risks to government bond liquidity
Esma won’t soften regulatory expectations for cloud and AI
CCP supervisory chair signals heightened scrutiny of third-party risk and operational resilience
BPI says SR 11-7 should go; bank model risk chiefs say ‘no’
Lobby group wants US guidance repealed; practitioners want consistent model supervision and audit
Esma supervision proposals ensnare Bloomberg and Tradeweb
Derivatives and bonds venues would become subject to centralised supervision
Industry frowns on FCA’s single-sided trade reporting efforts
Buy side warns UK attempt to ease Mifir burden may miss target; dealers aren’t happy either
One vision, two paths: UK reporting revamp diverges from EU
FCA and Esma could learn from each other on how to cut industry compliance costs
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising