![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Standardised approach may receive op risk charge cut, says ECB official
The operational risk charge related to the Basel II ‘standardised approach’ may be cut in the third consultative paper (CP3) due for release next month by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, according to Panagiotis Strouzas, a senior expert in the financial supervision division in the European Central Bank’s Directorate of Financial Stability and Supervision.
Strouzas said he had seen the results of the third quantitative impact study (QIS3) and believed the Basel Committee had largely achieved the correct credit risk weighting. But he added that a reduction of operational risk charges for the standardised approach would be reduced to make it more attractive for banks around the world – and particularly in the US – to move from the current Basel I capital Accord to the Basel II standardised approach. It is unclear by how much this operational risk will be reduced, but it will be a factor by which the volume of loans of the bank is multiplied instead of the current proposal related to a multiple of gross income. This will be at the discretion of individual national regulators, said Strouzas.
The treatment of operational risk has been a thorny issue for international regulators, with a number of industry participants claiming that efforts to take established quantitative analysis techniques in market risk and apply it to operational risk is unrealistic.
Banks can implement Basel II via three methods: the most complex is the so-called internal-ratings based approach; the standardised approach is an intermediate-level implementation; and the other option is the ‘basic approach’, which largely draws on the existing Basel I capital requirement definitions. The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision – the body developing the Basel II infrastructure – has a stated objective to reward banks with more sophisticated risk management practices.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
The standoff over separate account margining
CFTC issues sixth extension of no-action relief as long-awaited final rule stalls
Banks fret over vendor contracts as Dora deadline looms
Thousands of vendor contracts will need repapering to comply with EU’s new digital resilience rules
EU banks lose relief on model test after FRTB delay
Deferment of new trading book regime to January 2025 eats into transition period for “erratic” P&L attribution test
Sunday night football and the Basel III endgame
Big banks, political advocates and housing organisations are unlikely allies in race to dropkick new capital regime
Futures exchanges seek clarity on China licensing regime
Hazy details on landmark Futures and Derivatives Law breeds legal uncertainty, unnerving operators
Some EU banks wanted option to start FRTB on time
Representatives of member states raised possibility with European Commission at July meeting discussing the delay
For US Treasury troubles, treat the cause not the symptom
Regulatory alarm about hidden risk in the Treasury futures market misses the point, fund association execs write
Iosco delays pre-hedging consultation to November
Review into controversial practice splits industry