data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d4731/d4731cc6a1050048269dbaafbde58d7c0afa9ca7" alt="Risk.net"
LCH snubs DTCC merger
A proposed merger between London-based derivatives clearing house LCH.Clearnet and US clearing giant, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC) has fallen through.
In December LCH.Clearnet terminated the exclusivity arrangement of the merger agreement so as to entertain a potential rival bid from a consortium of major dealers. A letter from the consortium was read by LCH.Clearnet's board in its meeting yesterday detailing the dealers' progress towards making an offer. A spokesman for the consortium said that the firms have committed to making an offer by the end of next month.
Since the consortium was first announced on February 2, the composition of the group has evolved. Initially the group included BNP Paribas, Deutsche Bank - which was also acting as adviser on the acquisition - HSBC, JP Morgan, Royal Bank of Scotland, Société Générale, and UBS, along with interdealer broker Icap, while other firms such as Citi, and even the London Stock Exchange were reported to have been involved.
Currently the consortium is made up of 12 financial institutions. Deutsche Bank remains group adviser, but the spokesman declined to give the names of the other participants, except that at least three changes had been made from the original group.
See also: Dealer interest delays LCH.Clearnet and DTCC deal
LCH.Clearnet bid sparks conflict of interest fears
US and European firms in bid for LCH
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Large banks safer for CCPs than they get credit for
Plentiful pre-positioned liquidity softens the blow of resolution, new research argues
Basel uniformity fades as members defy dress code
Rule-makers diverge from Basel III standards, denting aims of comparability and fuelling fears over fair competition
Fate of US Treasury clearing deadline to be decided at crunch meeting
Isda chief predicts delay as clearing houses await confirmation of go-live dates
Value-at-risk models face neglect due to FRTB uncertainty
Some banks delaying material upgrades until timeline to replace VAR becomes clearer
CRR III hangs in the balance as member states push for changes
Top EU lawmaker rejects calls to water down capital rules, while others see room for manoeuvre
Looming US Basel endgame redraft sparks calls to save IRB
Experts say 20 years of data makes credit risk models more appropriate than standardised approach
Cool heads must guide financial regulation of climate risk
Supervisors can’t simply rely on ‘magical thinking’ of market discipline, says Sergio Scandizzo
Markets worry EU’s reporting simplification will add to burden
Rather than reducing firms’ obligations, market participants fear it could end up increasing requirements