NAB currency options desk 'back in the market', with limited trading
National Australia Bank (NAB) has resumed limited trading in currency options, as an April 30 deadline to amend its shortcomings passed last week, reports RiskNews ' sister publication FX Week .
Regulator the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (Apra) barred NAB from trading foreign exchange options until it had rectified risk management lapses responsible for a A$360 million (US$280 million) hole in its currency options portfolio originally reported in January.
A spokesperson for NAB in Melbourne said the bank is currently working with Apra to address the issues raised in its March 24 report. An Apra spokesperson in Sydney said it was unable to discuss its communications with NAB, although a source close to the regulator said there was no reason to believe the April 30 requirement – a review of the bank’s traded risk limits – would not be met.
This was the most important of Apra’s demands, which it described as the "minimum" to be achieved before NAB could start trading forex options again.
NAB is also making efforts to resolve its failed options pricing processes – which meant the traders were able to input their own revaluation data to mask losses – by trialling a range of risk management systems, according to market sources.
And the bank has already made large strides in the "key staff changes" Apra referred to in its report. On April 21, it appointed Lynne Peacock, the bank’s executive general manager in Europe, to manage "people and culture functions". The bank has also replaced its chief executive, chairman, head of risk management, head of markets, head of corporate and institutional banking, and both co-heads of global foreign exchange in the wake of the crisis.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation
Fed pivots to material risk – but what is it, exactly?
Top US bank regulator will prioritise risks that matter most, but they could prove hard to pinpoint