![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
BIS head defends complexity of Basel II
The most advanced approaches under the Basel II bank capital adequacy accord are likely to be complex if banks are to have the right incentives to measure and manage their risks, a senior international central banker said today.
To succeed in its aims, the risk-based accord requires “a comprehensive multifaceted framework” resting on the three mutually reinforcing pillars of minimum capital requirements, supervisory oversight and market discipline, he said.
Moreover, said Crockett, banks in emerging markets won’t be forced to adopt more complex methodologies.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of Basel II, is a committee of the BIS, the so-called central bankers’ central bank.
The Basel Committee itself is holding a quarterly meeting this week in Basel that is expected to end with an upbeat statement on progress with the controversial accord. The statement will follow several months of uncertainty during which some bankers questioned whether the accord would ever see the light of day.
Crockett said today that the Basel Committee has been careful to consult with a wide range of non-member countries and with the private sector.
Regulators hope Basel II will come into force for large international banks in late 2006.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
AI, quantum computing and tokenisation set to transform finance – Menon
But significant barriers remain preventing the technologies from unlocking their full potential
Vendors lack silver bullet for FRTB’s fund-linked issue
EU and UK legislators tried to ease capital charge by leaning on vendors, but problems persist
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
US Treasury official calls for SLR relief during market stress
Under Secretary Liang also urges scrutiny of “artificial incentives” for Treasury futures in 40-Act rules
US banks seek to open vendors’ black box on green data
Inaugural Fed climate scenario analysis flags lack of transparency around third-party models
Why FRTB models are on the edge of extinction
With only four banks known to be applying to use internal models for market risk, the fate of advanced modelling looks precarious
Reframing the Fed’s discount window
Funding window incentives and collateralised credit lines could transform bank liquidity in a crisis, argues Bill Nelson
Attention shifts to US, UK after European Union postpones FRTB
Risk Live: Global timeline still unclear, with banks hoping lawmakers will use delay to soften rules