UK financial firms face £1 billlion start-up bill for Mifid
UK-based financial services firms could face a £1 billion bill for implementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid), the UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) estimates.
The one-off cost of implementing Mifid is estimated to be between £870 million and £1 billion, with ongoing additional costs of about £100 million a year.
The heaviest financial burden will be the one-off costs arising from the introduction of the appropriateness test for non-advised sales, changes to client categorisation and best-execution requirements, and system changes required by new market transparency provisions (See: Mifid test is threat to banks).
However, Mifid could generate about £200 million per year in quantifiable ongoing benefits, which the FSA attributes to reductions in compliance and transaction costs.
Hector Sants, managing director of wholesale and institutional markets at the FSA, encouraged financial firms to focus on the opportunities offered by the directive – which comes into force next November – as well as the burden of additional costs.
Sants said: “It is in the nature of regulation that costs are relatively easy to define and quantify for firms, while benefits can be harder to pin down. As we have already foreshadowed, it is clear that implementation of Mifid represents a substantial cost to [the] industry particularly in the [next few] years, but it does create the potential for revenue opportunities over the longer term.”
The FSA’s cost estimates are based on a survey of firms in which they were asked to set out their actual and/or expected budget for Mifid implementation. The results from this survey were then aggregated using estimates of the total number of firms directly affected by Mifid. The benefits were calculated against a series of scenarios relating to the impact of Mifid on business practices in the UK’s financial services industry, and the extent to which Mifid contributes to the aim of creating a single EU market for financial services.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Barr defends easing of Basel III endgame proposal
Fed’s top regulator says he will stay and finish the package, is comfortable with capital impact
Bank of England to review UK clearing rules
Broader collateral set and greater margin transparency could be adopted from Emir 3.0, but not active accounts requirement
The wisdom of Oz? Why Australia is phasing out AT1s
Analysts think Australian banks will transition smoothly, but other countries unlikely to follow
EU trade repository matching disrupted by Emir overhaul
Some say problem affecting derivatives reporting has been resolved, but others find it persists
Barclays and HSBC opt for FRTB internal models
However, UK pair unlikely to chase approval in time for Basel III go-live in January 2026
Foreign banks want level playing field in US Basel III redraft
IHCs say capital charges for op risk and inter-affiliate trades out of line with US-based peers
CFTC’s Mersinger wants new rules for vertical silos
Republican commissioner shares Democrats’ concerns about combined FCMs and clearing houses
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements