UK financial firms face £1 billlion start-up bill for Mifid
UK-based financial services firms could face a £1 billion bill for implementing the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid), the UK’s Financial Services Authority (FSA) estimates.
The one-off cost of implementing Mifid is estimated to be between £870 million and £1 billion, with ongoing additional costs of about £100 million a year.
The heaviest financial burden will be the one-off costs arising from the introduction of the appropriateness test for non-advised sales, changes to client categorisation and best-execution requirements, and system changes required by new market transparency provisions (See: Mifid test is threat to banks).
However, Mifid could generate about £200 million per year in quantifiable ongoing benefits, which the FSA attributes to reductions in compliance and transaction costs.
Hector Sants, managing director of wholesale and institutional markets at the FSA, encouraged financial firms to focus on the opportunities offered by the directive – which comes into force next November – as well as the burden of additional costs.
Sants said: “It is in the nature of regulation that costs are relatively easy to define and quantify for firms, while benefits can be harder to pin down. As we have already foreshadowed, it is clear that implementation of Mifid represents a substantial cost to [the] industry particularly in the [next few] years, but it does create the potential for revenue opportunities over the longer term.”
The FSA’s cost estimates are based on a survey of firms in which they were asked to set out their actual and/or expected budget for Mifid implementation. The results from this survey were then aggregated using estimates of the total number of firms directly affected by Mifid. The benefits were calculated against a series of scenarios relating to the impact of Mifid on business practices in the UK’s financial services industry, and the extent to which Mifid contributes to the aim of creating a single EU market for financial services.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation