US trade associations step up opposition to Feinstein bill
A number of prominent US trade associations, along with leading financial and energy institutions, have called for the US Senate to veto efforts by Senator Dianne Feinstein to amend US energy legislation that would see more oversight of derivatives.
"These expert financial regulators have stated thatenactment of the amendment would be premature given the lack of opportunity for full review of the amendment by the relevant committees of jurisdiction, its implications for energy and other derivatives activity, and the absence of a determination that energy derivatives played a role in the collapse of Enron or the California energy crisis," they said in a letter to the Senate.
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, the American Bankers Association, The Bond Markets Association, the Managed Funds Association, the Futures Industry Association, the Gold Institute, the Securities Industry Association and the US Chamber of Commerce were among some of the organisations opposed to Feinstein's amendment - S.517.
Financial institutions included: JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation