
Confident regulators expect to issue upbeat Basel II statement next week
Global banking regulators are expected next week to make an upbeat statement on progress with the controversial Basel II bank Accord. This follows several months of uncertainty in which some bankers doubted the Accord would ever see the light of day.
The statement, expected at the end of the Basel Committee’s quarterly meeting in Basel, Switzerland next week, will reflect the mood of greater confidence among regulators now the vexed question of the treatment of lending to smaller business was resolved by compromise last month.
The German government, which faces elections in September, this week dropped its objections to Basel II in the wake of the compromise. Germany had previously threatened to veto Basel II if it penalised lending to small and medium-sized companies, regarded as the engine of economic growth in the country.
Some critics described the compromise, which centres on allowing banks to reserve on average 10% less capital on loans to smaller businesses compared with loans to large companies, as a fudge that undermines the risk-based principles Basel II is supposed to be based upon.
But regulators said the compromise can be justified by empirical evidence of the lower volatility of small company failure compared with that for larger companies.
In March, the Basel Committee decided to delay Basel II’s implementation to late 2006 from 2005 because of mounting problems in developing it. The 2005 date was in itself a delay from an original intention to bring the Accord into force in early 2004.
Hong Kong Monetary Authority deputy chief executive David Carse has since said that at that stage the chances of Basel II going ahead were only 50-50.
The Basel regulators, who mainly comprise senior banking supervisors from the Group of 10 leading economies, rejected a proposal for a so-called 'Basel-lite' solution to their problems. Basel-lite would have been an accord based on what the regulators could agree on at their March meeting, leaving the disagreements to be sorted out later or never at all.
The Basel Committee never formally stated its decision to delay the accord. Instead it left it to national regulators to confirm if asked and to bankers to infer from oblique references in subsequent committee documents.
Next week the committee is expected to confirm it intends issuing QIS3, the key third quantitative impact survey that will seek information from banks on how they might be affected by the Accord, on October 1.
The same date should see the issue of a separate paper on progress with the treatment of the technically difficult area of asset securitisation.
The third Basel II consultative paper is expected to be issued for comment by the banking industry in May next year.
The Basel Committee expects to issue its final version of Basel II in late 2003, possibly in November.
That should leave three years for banks to ready themselves for the Accord’s implementation in late 2006, or in effect January 1, 2007.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European Commission changes tune on proposed FRTB multiplier
Banks fear departure from original diversification factor undermines case for permanent relief
Supervisors should be mindful of geopolitical risks, says IMF
Shock events cause sizeable swings in asset pricing, institution’s latest report highlights
Bowman won’t commit to stress-testing the tariff shock
Nominated Fed vice-chair stonewalls calls to run ad hoc scenario similar to 2020 Covid test
Fed’s Bowman to ‘prioritise’ SLR exemption for US Treasuries
Reinstating Covid-era relief is a ‘no brainer’, dealers say, as bond markets reel from tariff chaos
SEC’s Peirce calls for rethink of international standards
Risk Live Boston: regulator rejects international calls for bank-like regulation of investors
Tariff turbulence piles pressure on banks’ VAR models
Backtesting breaches start to mount, but too early to tell if regulatory intervention needed
Trading desks want regulators to face down the NMRF monster
Rule-makers in Australia and the European Union are open to changes to the unpopular FRTB test
CFTC’s Doge-inspired drive to enforcement may fall short
Lawyers doubt guidance on rewards for self-reporting goes far enough