Delayed Basel II securitisation paper expected shortly
Global banking regulators hope to issue very shortly the delayed discussion paper on asset securitisation in the context of the complex Basel II capital accord that is aimed at making the world’s banking system safer.
The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the architect of Basel II and the body that effectively regulates international banking, will give details in the paper of its proposals for treating the credit risks for banks of asset securitisation. Asset securitisation occurs when a bank puts its loans and other credits into a pool and then issues fresh securities backed by the pool.
The problem of how banks should calculate the protective capital they need to act as a cushion to absorb losses from defaults on loans making up securitisations, has proved one of the most technically difficult of all the Basel II issues.
Regulators had hoped to issue the asset securitisation paper along with the QIS 3 – the third Basel II quantitative impact survey – on October 1, but the pressure of work created by QIS 3 forced a delay.
But, QIS 3, which seeks information from 265 banks in some 50 countries on how Basel II will affect them, contains the risk-weightings needed to calculate capital charges against asset securitisations. The discussion paper will flesh out the thinking behind the weightings as well as other issues.
The Basel Committee wants to implement Basel II from late 2006. Basel II will determine how much of their assets major banks will have to set aside as protective capital to guard against the hazards of banking, including credit, market and operational risks.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Basel Committee
FRTB implementation: key insights and learnings
Duncan Cryle and Jeff Aziz of SS&C Algorithmics discuss strategic questions and key decisions facing banks as they approach FRTB implementation
Basel concession strengthens US opposition to NSFR
Lobbyists say change to gross derivatives liabilities measure shows the whole ratio is flawed
Basel’s Tsuiki: review of bank rules no free-for-all
Evaluation of new framework by Basel Committee will not be excuse for tweaking pre-agreed rules
Pulling it all together: Challenges and opportunities for banks preparing for FRTB regulation
Content provided by IBM
EU lawmakers consider extending FRTB deadline
European Commission policy expert says current deadline is too ambitious
Custodians could face higher Basel G-Sib surcharges
Data shows removal of cap on substitutability in revised methodology would hit four banks
MEP: Basel too slow to deal with clearing capital clash
Isda AGM: Swinburne criticises Basel’s lethargy on clash between leverage and clearing rules
Fears of fragmentation over Basel shadow banking rules
Step-in risk guidelines could be taken more seriously in the EU than in the US