![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
UK bankers fear capital floors higher under latest Basel II plans
The British Bankers' Association (BBA) is concerned that global banking regulators appear to have raised and expanded the application of the capital charges floor in the Basel II bank Accord, a BBA official said today.
The BBA welcomed the overall statement as “a substantial step forward” in progress with the Accord, but not the last word. “We need the numbers and we need to test them,” the spokesman said.
The risk-based Accord will determine from late 2006 how much capital major banks must set aside as a cushion of reserves to guard against banking risks. A key aim is to encourage banks to use advanced models to measure the risks they face. Banks using advanced approaches should enjoy lower capital charges than banks using cruder methods.
The Basel Committee said today that it was dropping its earlier proposal that capital charges against operational risks for banks using advanced approaches should not initially fall below 75% of what they would be using the simpler standardised approach.
The Basel regulators had initially proposed a floor for banks using the advanced internal ratings-based (IRB) approach to measuring credit risk of 90% of the foundation IRB, the BBA spokesman said.
The existence of floors reflects regulator concern that the advantages of using advanced approaches shouldn’t be too great until Basel II is bedded down and any problems ironed out. Critics said the floors act as a disincentive to banks to use the advanced approaches.
Under the new approach announced today there would be a single capital floor for the first two years after the Accord comes into effect that would be related to the capital rules of the current and simpler Basel I accord that dates from 1988.
For the first year of the Accord’s operation, “IRB capital requirements for credit risk together with operational risk capital charges cannot fall below 90% of the current minimum required”, the committee said. Minimum protective capital under Basel I must be at least 8% of a bank’s risk-weighted assets.
The floor in the second year of Basel II will be 80% of the Basel I requirements.
The Basel Committee said it would be prepared to keep the floor in place beyond 2008 if problems emerged.
The BBA fears that the wording of today’s statement implies that the floor has been extended to both the advanced and foundation IRBs, and overall represents a higher a floor in practice than those proposed in the committee’s earlier proposals.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Printing this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. Copying this content is for the sole use of the Authorised User (named subscriber), as outlined in our terms and conditions - https://www.infopro-insight.com/terms-conditions/insight-subscriptions/
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
AI, quantum computing and tokenisation set to transform finance – Menon
But significant barriers remain preventing the technologies from unlocking their full potential
Vendors lack silver bullet for FRTB’s fund-linked issue
EU and UK legislators tried to ease capital charge by leaning on vendors, but problems persist
Does Basel’s internal loss multiplier add up?
As US agencies mull capital reforms, one regulator questions past losses as an indicator of future op risk
US Treasury official calls for SLR relief during market stress
Under Secretary Liang also urges scrutiny of “artificial incentives” for Treasury futures in 40-Act rules
US banks seek to open vendors’ black box on green data
Inaugural Fed climate scenario analysis flags lack of transparency around third-party models
Why FRTB models are on the edge of extinction
With only four banks known to be applying to use internal models for market risk, the fate of advanced modelling looks precarious
Reframing the Fed’s discount window
Funding window incentives and collateralised credit lines could transform bank liquidity in a crisis, argues Bill Nelson
Attention shifts to US, UK after European Union postpones FRTB
Risk Live: Global timeline still unclear, with banks hoping lawmakers will use delay to soften rules