US rule proposal could boost insurer derivatives use
The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC), an official body that develops model insurance regulations for adoption at the US state level, is considering a new accounting guideline that would allow US-based insurers to report hedge transactions in their underwriting income statements. All US insurers must comply with statutory accounting guidelines, so this potential change could encourage greater use of derivatives.
Remaining details will be discussed in a conference call next month.
Current US statutory guidelines require hedges to be reported in investment or other income, which has held up wider use of insurance risk hedging, according to Alton. “The accounting guideline we’re proposing for statutory is exactly what’s in FAS 133,” he said, referring to the new accounting standard requiring US corporations to mark their hedges to market. “If we can show we’ve transferred risk through a derivatives contract and the derivative's highly effective, then the benchmark is exactly the same for Gaap.”
Once entered on its underwriting income statement, a qualifying hedge under the new guideline could improve an insurer’s combined ratio and loss ratio, which measure insurer financial performance and credit quality.
Alton said the new guideline, if approved by the NAIC, and adopted by any US states, would not be a “night and day” change, but rather another tool for insurers to manage their risks in addition to traditional reinsurance.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
The Emir error reports that cost banks millions
Dealers lambast onerous EU requirement to notify clients of all errors and omissions
Basel stops short on wrong-way risk
New guidelines a step in right direction, but experts warn they won’t prevent another Archegos
Trump 2.0 bank supervision: simpler but no soft touch?
Republican FDIC vice-chair Travis Hill wants more focus on financial risk instead of process
Iosco mimics industry codes to tackle pre-hedging dilemma
Advocates breathe sigh of relief, but Iosco release carries suggested restrictions
Ice’s AFX swoop shines spotlight on Ameribor prospects
CEO John Shay steps down after exchange group buys firm for mortgage and index synergies
Barr’s Fed exit likely to delay, but not destroy, Basel III
Market risk, op risk and leverage ratio all in the sights of Barr’s potential successors
FCMs call for more oversight of self-clearing CCP members
Clearing firms worry that PTFs and market-makers joining CCPs en masse will increase systemic risk
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult