Getting into the market abuse mindset
I remember mentioning the EU's Market Abuse Directive to an op risk manager at a conference in the spring. The executive – who shall remain nameless – rolled his eyes, then indicated that it was nothing to do with him.
I think he has probably now changed his mind. The UK Treasury and the Financial Services Authority were wrapping up their consultation on the directive in mid-September, and executives said their firms were preparing robust responses. What has galvanised this attention? The Citigroup bond trading scandal.
Essentially, traders at Citigroup sold about e11 billion of euro-denominated government bonds in just a few minutes in one morning in early August. The massive sale caused the price of many of the securities to fall substantially. Then, the same traders bought the securities back hours later at a tidy profit. Several days later, the FSA announced an inquiry.
Certainly, this kind of trading will be more difficult to undertake lawfully under the new EU rules, and penalties will be stiffer. Also, the reputational risks firms will suffer will be larger – already Citigroup has taken a black eye over the bond affair from clients and other City and Wall Street firms alike. Op risk managers should take notice of the Market Abuse Directive, and its potential impact on their firms.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
CGB repo clearing is coming to Hong Kong … but not yet
Market wants at least five years to build infrastructure before regulators consider mandate
Rethinking model validation for GenAI governance
A US model risk leader outlines how banks can recalibrate existing supervisory standards
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
The changing shape of variation margin collateral
Financial firms are open to using a wider variety of collateral when posting VM on uncleared derivatives, but concerns are slowing efforts to use more non-cash alternatives
Repo clearing: expanding access, boosting resilience
Michel Semaan, head of RepoClear at LSEG, discusses evolving requirements in repo clearing
The state of IMA: great expectations meet reality
Latest trading book rules overhaul internal models approach, but most banks are opting out. Two risk experts explore why