Final US goodwill rule issued
Final rule issued to permit the deduction of goodwill from Tier I capital
These accounting changes aim to ease banks' capital accounting in light of the financial crisis. Quietly released and scarcely noticed by the media, an interagency notice of proposed rulemaking (NPR) was published on September 15 by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) and the Federal Reserve that provided for the more favourable accounting treatment of so-called goodwill, an intangible asset that reflects the difference between a bank's market value and its selling price.
Under the rule, the regulatory capital deduction for goodwill would be equal to the maximum capital reduction that could occur as a result of a complete write-off of the goodwill, which is equal to the amount of goodwill reported on the balance sheet under US generally accepted accounting principles, less any associated deferred tax liability. Essentially, the regulators are permitting buyers of banks and thrifts to count some of the goodwill towards meeting their regulatory capital requirements.
The current market turmoil has caused banks to drastically reign in their lending; this new rule is an attempt to reduce the erosion of their capital cushion. Although the move will be welcomed by many, some industry sources have described it as a desperate and dangerous solution.
The goodwill sale was last used during the savings and loan crisis of the 1980s and 1990s, when the Federal Home Loan Board (now the OTS) permitted thrifts to count goodwill towards regulatory capital, which helped many institutions in the short run. However, once it was taken away, the overall cost of the bail-out skyrocketed, as it had masked insolvency and allowed thrifts to become even more leveraged relative to assets. Some say there is a danger the current situation will follow the same path.
The final rule will be effective 30 days after publication in the Federal Register. However, banking organisations may adopt its provisions for purposes of regulatory capital reporting for the period ending December 31, 2008.
Click here for the draft Federal Register notice.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Stuck in the middle with EU: dealers clash over FRTB timing
Largest banks want Commission to delay implementation, but it’s not the legislator’s only option
Treasury clearing timeline ‘too aggressive’ says BofA rates head
Sifma gears up for extension talks with incoming SEC and Treasury officials
Rostin Behnam’s unfinished business
Next CFTC chair must finish the work Behnam started on crypto regulation and conflicts of interest
European Commission in ‘listening mode’ on potential FRTB changes
Delay or relief measures on the table after UK postpones start of Basel III to 2027
Australian FRTB projects slow down amid scheduling uncertainty
Market risk experts think Apra might soften NMRF regime to spur internal model adoption
EBA to address double-counting caused by new capital floor
Existing EU capital add-ons for model risk would duplicate new Basel floor on internal models
The Emir error reports that cost banks millions
Dealers lambast onerous EU requirement to notify clients of all errors and omissions
Basel stops short on wrong-way risk
New guidelines a step in right direction, but experts warn they won’t prevent another Archegos