FSA fines two UK firms in major TCF crackdown
LONDON - HFC Bank has been fined £1.085 million for mis-selling payment protection insurance (PPI) by the UK's Financial Services Authority (FSA).
For two years HFC - a subsidiary of HSBC - sold PPI to 163,000 customers but failed to provide suitable advice, or put adequate systems and controls in place. The firm did not require its advisers to gather enough information on customers' financial circumstances, explain fully why they recommended a sale, or identify to customers any demands and needs that the policy would not meet.
Taking out PPI - designed to protect against unemployment or illness - is the most lucrative form of UK insurance. It can add costs of £3,000 to a £7,500 loan. The bank joins 11 other firms fined for mis-selling PPI, including GE Capital Bank, which was fined £610,000, and Capital One Bank, which was fined £175,000.
Meanwhile, stockbroker Square Mile was fined £250,000 for using persistent high-pressure sales tactics and misleading information to sell consumers shares they did not want or could not afford. The firm deals in derivatives and securities sold on the Alternative Investment Market and PLUS markets, which provide primary and secondary trading services for smaller capitalised and emerging companies. Examples of the firm's sales tactics included telephoning one customer 17 times in 10 days, and selling almost £300,000 of high-risk securities to an 89-year-old customer without permission. The penalties to HFC and Square Mile mark a significant increase in enforcement of the principles of the FSA's Treating Customers Fairly (TCF) initiative.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Capital neutrality key to completing Basel III, says Quarles
Former Republican Fed vice-chair thinks Hill or Bowman could help revive stalled prudential rules
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk