US fines Lloyds TSB $350m for breaking international rules
New York & Washington, DC - UK bank Lloyds TSB has agreed to hand over $350 million (£231 million) to US enforcement authorities for channelling Sudanese and Iranian money into the US banking system, violating the US International Emergency Economic Powers Act. Investigators from the federal US Department of Justice collaborated with the office of 89-year-old Manhattan district attorney Robert Morgenthau. The New York state and federal authorities will share $175 million each of the landmark payout.
The US justice department said between 1995 and 2007 Lloyds routinely removed customer names, bank names and addresses from payments to avoid red flags from US filtering processes. The bank accepts criminal conduct in the case involving at least $350 million originating in Iran and Sudan and other international hotspots. Court documents named Lloyds' offices in London and Dubai, and say the bank commonly referred to its practice as "stripping" or "repairing" wire transfers. Iranian banks Bank Melli, Bank Saderat and Bank Sepah, plus the Sudanese National Bank of Khartoum, were named as Lloyds clients involved. Lloyds must now open its books to CIA, FBI and other investigative agencies to determine the origin of funds.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
Dora flood pitches banks against vendors
Firms ask vendors for late addendums sometimes unrelated to resiliency, requiring renegotiation
Swiss report fingers Finma on Credit Suisse capital ratio
Parliament says bank would have breached minimum requirements in 2022 without regulatory filter
‘It’s not EU’: Do government bond spreads spell eurozone break-up?
Divergence between EGB yields is in the EU’s make-up; only a shared risk architecture can reunite them
CFTC weighs third-party risk rules for CCPs
Clearing houses could be required to formally identify and monitor critical vendors
Why there is no fence in effective regulatory relationships
A chief risk officer and former bank supervisor says regulators and regulated are on the same side
Snap! Derivatives reports decouple after Emir Refit shake-up
Counterparties find new rules have led to worse data quality, threatening regulators’ oversight of systemic risk
Critics warn against softening risk transfer rules for insurers
Proposal to cut capital for unfunded protection of loan books would create systemic risk, investors say