Reg NMS won’t damage NYSE competitiveness, says boss
NYSE chief defends Reg NMS
NEW YORK - The chief executive of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) has gone on the defensive against claims that the forthcoming Regulation National Market System (Reg NMS) directive will damage the exchange’s market share, and benefit competitors.
In an interview with the Financial Times, John Thain denied that Reg NMS, which will prioritise securing the best price available from all available markets as the key factor in the best execution of a trade, will disadvantage the NYSE over the NASDAQ.
“I don’t think Reg NMS poses any competitive issues for us, because it says you have to send orders to the market at the best price, and we have the best price 80% of the time,” said Thain.
His comments come in the wake of statements last week by Goldman Sachs analyst Joshua Carter, who changed his rating of NYSE stock from ‘neutral’ to ‘sell’, and shifted his NASDAQ recommendation from ‘neutral’ to ‘buy’. Carter claimed he based his decision on the superiority of the NASDAQ’s electronic execution platforms, and his belief that such technology will prove invaluable under the Reg NMS regime.
NYSE, on the other hand, is widely regarded as having dragged its feet over the issue of technology, and has been thought of as playing catch-up with the all-electronic NASDAQ for some time, although Thain claims the new Arca trading platform employed by the NYSE provides the highest available execution speed for those who need it.
Reg NMS came into effect in the US in March, one month later than planned, due to technical difficulties with trade executions at the NYSE. Broker-dealers are not obliged to fully comply with best execution requirements until July.
Carter’s comments had immediate effects – within 24 hours NYSE prices had slipped 5.5%, while NASDAQ shares climbed 3.2%, after he stated that the faster technology offered by the younger exchange would make it more attractive to brokers under the new regime.
Some investment banks and brokers have expressed hopes that Reg NMS will present an opportunity to end the dominance of the two exchanges in the US equities markets, while others have questioned whether it represents a further unnecessary burden to traders already beleaguered by regulation.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
European banks search for consensus on credit spread risk
New EBA guidelines spawn diverging interpretations of which products must be assessed for CSRBB
Dutch regulator in new push on algo manipulation
AFM teams up with Oxford Uni academics to develop data models that will identify “harmful” collusion in automated trading
Fed relief plan for G-Sib agency clearing welcomed
Rollback may revive interest in European FCM model, as principal clearing still treated punitively
Indian initial margin launch brings operational headaches
Conglomerates with multiple entities trading derivatives pose compliance challenges for dealers
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy