FSA FINES NORWICH UNION LIFE £1.26M
LONDON - The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) has fined Norwich Union Life £1.26 million for exposing its customers' confidential information to fraud.
Several external fraud incidents took place, due to poor systems and controls at the firm, which resulted in a number of customers' names and dates of birth becoming publicly available. The fraudsters gained further confidential account access and information by impersonating customers in calls to the firm's call centres.
In all, 74 customers' policies - totalling £3.3 million - were surrendered to identity theft scams during 2006. The FSA said Norwich Union Life had failed its customers by not keeping their information secure and not properly assessing its fraud risk.
The company's own compliance department reported to superiors on the exposure after it had taken place, but nothing was at first done to rectify the problem. Norwich Union Life co-operated with the FSA investigation, conducting a review of information security processes and reinstating the policies in full.
Margaret Cole, FSA enforcement director, says: "This fine is a clear message that the FSA takes information security seriously and requires that firms do so too."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation