SEC and EU start mutual recognition talks on exchange trading
US and European Union regulators collaborate over exchange trading
WASHINGTON, DC – New rules allowing US investors to directly invest in European Union (EU) exchanges and trading platforms have been discussed by Christopher Cox, chairman of the Securities & Exchange Commission (SEC) and Charlie McCreevy, the European Commissioner for the Internal Market and Services.
The SEC revealed a framework for mutual recognition talks would be resolved this year with the European Commission (EC) and the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR).
The two regulators discussed recent market turbulence, credit rating agencies, accounting standards, sovereign wealth funds and mutual recognition of securities regulation.
Current rules require EU investors to register with the SEC, and for US investors to trade through an EU exchange member instead of directly through their US broker – mutual recognition would remove these barriers.
An SEC statement last week said: “An EU-US mutual recognition arrangement for securities would have the potential to facilitate access of EU and US investors to broader and deeper transatlantic trading and transaction costs and increase oversight co-ordination among regulators.”
But the breadth of mutual recognition has yet to be seen.
“While the proposals are a positive step, I would be concerned if they were only to apply to traditional stock exchanges and exclude alternative trading systems, as this would give the formal bourses an unfair advantage,” says Rob Falkner, a partner at law firm Morgan Lewis.
“These platforms need to be treated in the same way. This certainly would undo the intention of the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive for creating competition from other exchanges and trading platforms."
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Australian FRTB projects slow down amid scheduling uncertainty
Market risk experts think Apra might soften NMRF regime to spur internal model adoption
EBA to address double-counting caused by new capital floor
Existing EU capital add-ons for model risk would duplicate new Basel floor on internal models
The Emir error reports that cost banks millions
Dealers lambast onerous EU requirement to notify clients of all errors and omissions
Basel stops short on wrong-way risk
New guidelines a step in right direction, but experts warn they won’t prevent another Archegos
Trump 2.0 bank supervision: simpler but no soft touch?
Republican FDIC vice-chair Travis Hill wants more focus on financial risk instead of process
Iosco mimics industry codes to tackle pre-hedging dilemma
Advocates breathe sigh of relief, but Iosco release carries suggested restrictions
Ice’s AFX swoop shines spotlight on Ameribor prospects
CEO John Shay steps down after exchange group buys firm for mortgage and index synergies
Barr’s Fed exit likely to delay, but not destroy, Basel III
Market risk, op risk and leverage ratio all in the sights of Barr’s potential successors