![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
US banks biding time on Basel II, says Dugan
US comptroller of the currency John Dugan says US banks are in no rush to implement Basel II
WASHINGTON, DC – Not one US bank will begin to implement Basel II’s capital adequacy requirements by the earliest possible date of April 1, according to the US comptroller of the currency, John Dugan.
Tier I banks such as Citigroup will use their full 36-month window to begin Basel II implementation, said Dugan at an international banking conference on Monday.
“We haven't received any notifications, so I think it's safe to say no national bank will be starting on that earliest possible date. The next time an institution could begin that process is July 1, but we don't yet know if any institution will begin as of that date,” he said.
Concerns over the validity of Basel II’s capital requirement models have been exacerbated by the unforeseen turbulence in the US subprime mortgage market and its overspill into the global credit crunch.
Market illiquidity has also contributed to US banks’ reluctance to rush into the flexible but lower capital requirements offered by Basel II models.
Dugan emphasised the short-term stress for banks created by problems in the US mortgage market and the long-term nature of Basel II requirements, saying regulators “might need to consider taking steps – possibly including imposing higher minimum capital requirements”.
The Basel II implementation framework involves a one-year test period followed by three years for complete implementation. Banks are limited to a 5% capital reduction in their first year of implementation, 10% in the second and 15% in the third.
The US has only adopted Basel II’s rules for its largest and international ‘core banks’ – such as Citigroup, JP Morgan and Bank of America. The comptroller of the currency said a rule for smaller banks could be expected in the second quarter of 2008.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Let’s grow the third-party risk playbook – CME security chief
CrowdStrike outage highlights need for financial sector to adjust its game plan
Op risk data: Payday lender Skytrail sees $1.4bn disappear
Also: Cartel claims cost European bond dealers dearly, plus oil price gouging and crypto cover-ups. Data by ORX News
Bankers hope EBA op risk taxonomy will go global
Proposed update to 20-year-old risk map is welcomed, but international co-ordination urged
Marex plots interest rate clearing push
UK broker is live on LCH and plans to be a “day one” clearing member on FMX
Eurex default fund reshuffle leaves members frustrated
Clearing members say concentration margin add-ons would be fairer than buffer on all portfolios
Tired of fat-finger blunders, G-Sibs turn to robots for help
Big banks speed up shift towards control automation and AI adoption to counter costly human errors, Benchmarking survey finds
CME, FICC in talks to expand cross-margining to client accounts
New rules and account structures will be needed to allow cross-margining by non-members
On geopolitical risk, G-Sibs choose their battles
Conflicts – both existing and threatened – raise concern among banks, but many are still grappling to weave the risk into their frameworks