Nine US banks asked to justify bonuses
Waxman demands US global banks explain billions in employee remuneration
WASHINGTON, DC – In letters to nine US banks, Henry Waxman, chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, has demanded they justify billions of dollars in compensation and bonuses paid out after they accepted $125 billion as part of a taxpayer-funded bail-out.
In the letter, sent to Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Bank of New York Mellon, JP Morgan, Merrill Lynch, Morgan Stanley, State Street and Wells Fargo, Waxman said they collectively will pay $108 billion in employee compensation and bonuses in the first nine months of this year, almost the same amount as last year.
“I question the appropriateness of depleting the capital that taxpayers have just injected into the banks through the payment of billions of dollars in bonuses, especially after one of the financial industry's worst years on record,” Waxman wrote. He also referred to a Bloomberg News article of October 27 that detailed how Goldman, Morgan Stanley and Merrill Lynch had already accrued $20 billion to pay bonuses this year.
Waxman wants banks to divulge their total company compensation arrangements, including the average compensation for each employee broken down by salaries, bonuses, and benefits, as well as the number of employees paid or projected to be paid more than $500,000 in each year from 2006 to 2008. Waxman has asked the firms to supply the information by November 10.
Goldman Sachs indicated that it will co-operate with Waxman’s request, while a Citigroup spokesperson confirmed the bank would “adhere to the requirements in the government programme, including restrictions on executive compensation”.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Fed’s new liquidity rule spells more pain for regional banks
Limit on HTM assets follows move to deduct unrealised losses from capital buffers
Ruled out: can regulators settle the pre-hedging debate?
Market participants are at odds over the practice and whether regulation or principles can settle the score
SEC streamlines overhaul of stock trading rules
Tick size and access fee rules simplified from first draft, but Peirce still questions rationale
Supervisors use generative AI to tame ‘chaotic’ data
Officials merge credit databases with unstructured reports to sharpen bank oversight, explains Banco de España ex-deputy
EU banks fear loss of NSFR repo relief
European Commission must decide by next June; other jurisdictions adopted softer calibration
Running the numbers on Barr’s Basel III endgame revisions
Fed vice-chair’s plan to ease capital requirements for big banks still lacks critical details
Endgame manoeuvre: US banks put SLR reform back in spotlight
Plan to ease Basel III brings renewed focus to impact of leverage ratio on US Treasury market
Regulators want to fix AT1s. Investors want restraint
Tweaking the instrument that regulators love to hate may be the only way to prevent its abolition