Mifid: new UK notifications as Mifid deadline approaches
The UK Treasury notifies the EU Commission of new FSA requirements
LONDON – The UK Financial Services Authority (FSA) is one of the few national regulators in the EU on target to implement the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (Mifid), but it is still engaged in ironing out some last-minute wrinkles.
Article 4 of the Mifid Level 2 Implementing Directive limits the ability of EU member states to apply additional requirements to some of the areas covered by Mifid, prescribing conditions for creating or retaining additional national requirements and requiring national notification and justification of these for the Commission’s approval.
The FSA’s policy statement of July 2007 reported an agreement with the Commission regarding retaining measures covered by Article 4. These included conditions for independent advisers, provision of simplified prospectuses and key facts documents by advisers, the Commission’s disclosure in relation to the sale of packaged products, and investment managers’ use of client-dealing commission.
The Commission has since indicated that it does not require notification of some of these measures under Article 4, as they fall under national discretion. As a precaution, the UK Treasury has forwarded two notifications to the Commission on behalf of the FSA. These are notification of the retention of the FSA’s requirements on the use of dealing commission provisions. “This represents a continuation of UK rules introduced about two years ago,” says Alan Jenkins, European head of Mifid at BearingPoint. They are also notification of the retention of certain requirements for the packaged products market. These new notifications replace those issued on January 31, 2007, which have been withdrawn.
The Treasury’s notification of the FSA’s retention of requirements for dealing commission provisions explains that, under soft commission and bundled brokerage arrangements, goods and services are supplied to a portfolio manager in return for business put through a broker. “The UK feels it needs stronger constraints on soft commission than are provided by the inducements provisions in Mifid,” says Jenkins. In January 2006 the FSA began using dealing commission provisions to address particular market failures of these arrangements that were not adequately addressed by its general provisions on inducements.
In the notification to the Commission for the retention of specific requirements for the UK packaged products market, the Treasury justifies the FSA’s requirements retained in some areas that may require notification under Article 4. These requirements relate to the accuracy of representations of the service offered, information on product and service costs (hard disclosure of commission and commission equivalent).
Alan Jenkins says the editions represent “marginal extensions to what is specified in Mifid, but the notification demonstrates the strength of FSA feeling that these should be maintained after November 1”. The notifications are broadly as previously proposed in January. “The key point is that they have been agreed with the Commission,” says Jenkins.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Adapting FRTB strategies across Apac markets
As Apac banks face FRTB deadlines, MSCI explores the insights from early adopters that can help them align with requirements
Republican SEC may focus on fixed income – Peirce
Commissioner also wants a revival of finders’ exemption, more guidance for UST clearing
Streamlining shareholding disclosure compliance
Shareholding disclosure compliance is increasingly complex due to a global patchwork of regulations and the challenge of managing vast amounts of data
Banks take aim at Gruenberg’s brokered deposit rule
Regulatory lawyers question need to reverse 2020 rulemaking just four years later
Time running out to backload Emir derivatives reporting
Significant slice of legacy trades still not ready for new formats, as October 26 deadline looms
Gensler to stick to Treasury clearing timetable
SEC chief promises to keep up the pressure for done-away trades
Clearing houses fear being classified as Dora third parties
As 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members seek risk information that’s usually deemed confidential
Citizens’ growth won’t bow to regulatory thresholds, CRO says
Risk Live: Bank faces stricter capital and liquidity requirements if it crosses $250 billion in assets