Banks using ‘discretion’ to report loan losses
Regulators tolerate less standardised reporting during industry weakness
Financial regulators are allowing banks to use their own discretion in reporting loan losses during periods of industry weakness to temporarily preserve financial stability, a new report has claimed.
A working paper from the Bank for International Settlements entitled Regulatory discretion and banks’ pursuit of “safety in similarity”, found that institutions: “may be permitted to exercise more discretion in their reporting of charge-offs when the banking system is weaker than when the problem is more isolated”.
“Such discretion has the desired effect of at least temporarily preserving financial stability and it may also encourage banks to cluster to gain ‘safety in similarity’. Whether more clustering adds to financial stability is an open question,” the report charges.
The study looked at the annual charge-offs and provisions for loan losses for the 30 largest US banks between 1979 and 2005, and worked off the hypothesis that: “bank regulators grant banks more discretion in reporting charge-offs when the system is weaker” while they are “likely to be less generous with the reporting discretion options that they confer…when the industry is stronger.”
Researchers also found that risk-taking behaviour among banks is largely determined by the behaviour of peer banks and that the ‘clustering’ observed in loss reporting extends into risk appetites.
“In addition we [found] that individual banks detectably change their risk-taking to make it more like that of other banks during periods when the banking industry is weaker,” the paper concludes.
The full report can be found on the Bank for International Settlements’ website: www.bis.org.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation