State sues Accenture for data loss
Connecticut has sued its computer consultancy for negligence over data loss.
CONNECTICUT – US State Connecticut has sued its own computer consultancy Accenture for undisclosed damages over the loss of nearly 460 state-agency bank account numbers and personnel data of 58 individuals. Connecticut attorney general Richard Blumenthal announced that he is suing the company for illegal negligence, unauthorized use of state property, and breach of contract.
A computer backup tape stolen in Ohio contained confidential data copied by Accenture and taken out of state in violation of its $98 million contract. An Accenture employee is believed to have violated company security rules by transferring the data to Ohio, where the consultancy is developing a similar financial data system to the one it produced for Connecticut. The theft was possible because of Ohio's low-tech system of data protection.
Accenture is conducting its own review of the incident and released a statement: “Based on what we know today, we believe that our policies were inadvertently not followed," the statement read. “We intend to take appropriate actions with any individuals involved and to reinforce with all of our employees, as we do on a regular basis, the importance of following our privacy and data protection policies.”
Although Comptroller Nancy Wyman was keen to point out that Connecticut's data is backed up nightly on computer at the University of Connecticut, a private vendor securing copies and safeguarding data for banks and insurance companies, the full ramifications of the theft have yet to be realised.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Regulation
Market doesn’t share FSB concerns over basis trade
Industry warns tougher haircut regulation could restrict market capacity as debt issuance rises
FCMs warn of regulatory gaps in crypto clearing
CFTC request for comment uncovers concerns over customer protection and unchecked advertising
UK clearing houses face tougher capital regime than EU peers
Ice resists BoE plan to move second skin in the game higher up capital stack, but members approve
ECB seeks capital clarity on Spire repacks
Dealers split between counterparty credit risk and market risk frameworks for repack RWAs
FSB chief defends global non-bank regulation drive
Schindler slams ‘misconception’ that regulators intend to impose standardised bank-like rules
Fed fractures post-SVB consensus on emergency liquidity
New supervisory principles support FHLB funding over discount window preparedness
Why UPIs could spell goodbye for OTC-Isins
Critics warn UK will miss opportunity to simplify transaction reporting if it spurns UPI
EC’s closing auction plan faces cool reception from markets
Participants say proposal for multiple EU equity closing auctions would split price formation