Majority of firms unprepared for Mifid implementation, survey finds
The latest in a long line of surveys reiterates the fact that the majority EU firms will not be ready for Mifid by the deadline.
Yet another study from a software vendor has indicated that only a small proportion of financial service firms are on track with their preparations for the implementation of Mifid, which comes into force on November 1.
The latest research, conducted by SunGard and TradeTech, found that only 13% of firms surveyed are on track to meet the Mifid requirements by the deadline, while 60% of respondents indicated that their preparations still needed some work.
The results, taken from the third in a quarterly series of polls undertaken by SunGard and TradeTech, reinforce those of an earlier poll, in which over 65% of respondents admitted they were yet to even identify or plan operational budgets to meet the demands of the directive.
Even though only three countries have transposed Mifid into national law, 63% of those surveyed did not believe that this would delay the implementation programmes for firms located in countries that were on track.
However, respondents were concerned that firms located in the countries lagging behind with the transposition of Mifid would be placed at a competitive disadvantage. Some 46% of those surveyed also stated that they remained concerned that their own national regulators would add further complexity to Mifid through the imposition of national laws and additional guidance. Commissioner McCreevy has however begun infringement proceedings against the countries that have not yet transposed, and has urged firms to push their governments to bring Mifid transposition to the front of the regulatory agenda.
Best Execution for equities remains one of the biggest challenges for firms – only 23% of firms believe they will know how to ensure Best Execution by the end of April, with most (62%) estimating an August/September timeline. More than 70% of firms expect to use “post-trade statistical analysis” to ensure best execution, with over 45% expecting to do pre-trade analysis and more than 40% expecting to use manual reviews.
“Many buy-side firms are now expecting to opt down to professional status, with the impact that many will become Systematic Internalisers. Of those surveyed, 25% of buy-side firms now believe they will become Systematic Internalisers within the next five years – a significant increase from six months ago,” said Richard Thornton, head of Mifid consulting at SunGard Consulting Services.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Operational risk
Integrated GRC solutions 2024: market update and vendor landscape
In the face of persistent digitisation challenges and the attendant transformation in business practices, many firms have been struggling to maintain governance and business continuity
Vendor spotlight: Dixtior AML transaction monitoring solutions
The Chartis Research report, AML transaction monitoring solutions, considers how, by working together, financial institutions, vendors and regulators can create more effective anti-money laundering (AML) systems.
Financial crime and compliance50 2024
The detailed analysis for the Financial crime and compliance50 considers firms’ technological advances and strategic direction to provide a complete view of how market leaders are driving transformation in this sector
Automating regulatory compliance and reporting
Flaws in the regulation of the banking sector have been addressed initially by Basel III, implemented last year. Financial institutions can comply with capital and liquidity requirements in a natively integrated yet modular environment by utilising…
Investment banks: the future of risk control
This Risk.net survey report explores the current state of risk controls in investment banks, the challenges of effective engagement across the three lines of defence, and the opportunity to develop a more dynamic approach to first-line risk control
Op risk outlook 2022: the legal perspective
Christoph Kurth, partner of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses the key themes emerging from Risk.net’s Top 10 op risks 2022 survey and how financial firms can better manage and mitigate the impact of…
Emerging trends in op risk
Karen Man, partner and member of the global financial institutions leadership team at Baker McKenzie, discusses emerging op risks in the wake of the Covid‑19 pandemic, a rise in cyber attacks, concerns around conduct and culture, and the complexities of…
Moving targets: the new rules of conduct risk
How are capital markets firms adapting their approaches to monitoring and managing conduct risk following the Covid‑19 pandemic? In a Risk.net webinar in association with NICE Actimize, the panel discusses changing regulatory requirements, the essentials…