Credit rating agencies under scrutiny again
McCreevy and the CESR discuss how credit rating agencies should treat structured finance products
BRUSSELS – the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) held more talks with the European Union’s internal markets commissioner, Charlie McCreevy, on September 11. The CESR’s 2006 questionnaire of credit rating agencies and the recent subprime mortgage crisis have placed the agencies’ conduct and role under increased scrutiny. McCreevy has asked the CESR to further analyse the process that agencies use to rate structured finance products.
The CESR has been asked to consider a number of conflict-of-interest issues revealed by the 2006 report. The report suggests that interaction and negotiation between rating analysts and arrangers in the design of structured financial products presents an obvious conflict of interest. The independence of the rating process is further compromised by issuers’ payment for ratings. So the CESR is assessing the agencies’ adherence to the Iosco Code of Conduct Fundamentals for Credit Rating Agencies and the effectiveness of the code in addressing conflicts of interest in securitisation and structured credit.
The transparency of the methodologies employed to produce the agencies’ credit ratings is also under scrutiny. This particularly concerns the assumptions by which the methodologies operate, whether they can be improved, and whether investors are sufficiently warned of their limitations. Provisions were discussed for the publication of reviews for all structured finance ratings.
Also under analysis is the agencies’ ability to keep pace with the rapid evolution of the complex structured finance market and the growth of securitisation issues over the past decade. The quality, status and timing of rating decisions are also being reviewed.
McCreevy has asked the CESR to consult the US Securities & Exchange Commission in addition to its meeting with the credit rating agencies at the beginning of October. He has also requested the CESR’s preliminary views and policy advice on these points before the release of its 2008 annual report in April of the role of agencies and their compliance with the Iosco Code.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
On resilience risk, banks prepare to let the bad times roll
Lenders bolster first-line teams and upskill boards as compliance with new rules bites
Complex EU active account reporting could drive trades out of UK
Draft Emir rules might not force large volumes to move to EU, but will make compliance difficult
Strategies for navigating market volatility in the post-US election landscape
This article examines the key themes of a recent webinar, sponsored by S&P Global Market Intelligence, on market volatility following the US election, including inflation risks, commodities, geopolitical uncertainty, ESG considerations and the role of…
Risk.net’s top 10 investment risks for 2025
Fresh concerns this year include a trade war, a stock market crash and growing social discord
For banks, change risk is inevitable; managing it, optional
Regional bank survey shows steady growth of dedicated change risk functions and adoption of leading indicators
Clearing members ponder the purpose of CME’s mystery FCM
Some think licence will be used to boost crypto clearing capacity, but many questions remain
Review of 2024: as markets took a breather, firms switched focus
In the absence of major crises and rules deadlines, financial firms revamped strategy, services and practices
As supplier risk grows, banks check their third-party guest lists
Dora forces rethink of KRI and appetite frameworks amid reappraisal of what constitutes a key counterparty