A little respect
First, a bit of gloating. The April edition noted that there was a serious risk of Basel II deadlines being pushed back in the US and Europe, and now that looks as it has come to pass, at least in the US ( see related article, in this issue )
I have also had several rather kind notes about last month’s editorial, on the relationship between Rousseau and Basel II. I must confess that it was the product of a debate I had with a colleague after drinking far too much red wine while at a conference in Madrid, so am glad that my ramblings made some sense.
This month’s thought? At the risk of sounding like I am shamelessly pandering to Operational Risk’s readership, I’d like to say I am surprised at just how under-appreciated op risk managers seem to be. Our third annual op risk survey, sponsored by consulting firm Protiviti, shows that although more and more responsibility is being placed on the shoulders of op risk managers, the funding that should be coming through to help them meet this increased burden doesn’t seem to be in place.
And in our monthly survey, we asked if operational risk managers’ "board of directors understand operational risk to the level of sophistication you consider appropriate?" The answer was a resounding ‘no’ – 78.6% answered that way.
Should we initiate an annual ‘Operational Risk Respect Day’? Thoughts welcome, as always…
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Risk management
Reimagining model risk management: new tools and approaches for a new era
A collaborative report by Chartis and Evalueserve on how the use of automation can combat the growing complexity of managing model risk due to regulation and market volatility
What Goldman’s appeal victory means for Fed stress tests
Decision could embolden more banks to appeal, analysts say. But others believe result is one-off
Clearing members rattled as CME approved to launch its own FCM
National Futures Association registration sharpens concerns about conflict of interest with CCP
CME files application for US Treasury and repo clearing
New entrant believes direct user access model will avoid accounting problem that hampers rival FICC
UST repo clearing: considerations for ‘done-away’ implementation
Citi’s Mariam Rafi sets out the drivers for sponsored and agent clearing of Treasury repo and reverse repo
Gensler to stick to Treasury clearing timetable
SEC chief promises to keep up the pressure for done-away trades
Clearing houses fear being classified as Dora third parties
As 2025 deadline looms, CCP and exchange members seek risk information that’s usually deemed confidential
IASB cautions hedging fix won’t be perfect, but it will help
Banks optimistic that new model could prevent broken hedges driving balance sheet volatility