The ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model Backtesting Framework
Eduardo Epperlein, James McEwen and Wahb Ettoumi
Introduction
Variation and Initial Margin in the ISDA Credit Support Annex
Variation and Initial Margin Required by Central Counterparty Clearing Houses
Margin Requirements for Over-the-Counter Derivatives: A Supervisory Perspective
The Emergence and Concepts of the SIMM Methodology
The ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model Backtesting Framework
The Impact of Margin on Regulatory Capital
XVA for Margined Trading Positions
Modelling Forward Initial Margin Requirements for Bilateral Trading
Forward Valuation of Initial Margin in Exposure and Funding Calculations
Margin Value Adjustment for CCPs with Q-Simulated Initial Margin
Bilateral Exposure in the Presence of Margin
Central Counterparty Risk
Robust Computation of XVA Metrics for Central Counterparty Clearing Houses
Efficient Initial Margin Optimisation
Procyclicality in Sensitivity-Based Margin Requirements
Systemic Risks in Central Counterparty Clearing House Networks
5.1 INTRODUCTION
Backtesting is the cornerstone of objective risk model validation, and is used by model developers, independent model validators and regulators as their principal tool for initial and ongoing model approval. In particular, for market risk capital models such as value-at-risk (VaR) and counterparty credit risk capital models such as the internal model method (IMM), there are well-established frameworks for backtesting-based model validation. The significant experience from capital models may conveniently be leveraged in creating the appropriate backtesting framework for the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM).
As described in Chapter 4 of this volume, SIMM was developed by an ISDA-led industry group to capture the margin requirements over a ten-day margin period of risk at a 99% confidence level for non-centrally cleared derivatives. Following the guidance from BCBS/IOSCO (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and International Organization of Securities Commissions 2013) that “margin requirements for non-centrally cleared derivatives would be expected to reduce contagion and spillover effects by
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net