Journal of Risk
ISSN:
1465-1211 (print)
1755-2842 (online)
Editor-in-chief: Farid AitSahlia
![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
The influence of tracking error on volatility risk premium estimation
James S. Doran
Abstract
ABSTRACT
I investigate whether the volatility risk premium is negative in energy and equity markets by examining the statistical properties of delta–gamma hedged option portfolios (selling the option, hedging with the underlying contract, and correcting for tracking error with an additional option). By correcting for gamma, these hedged portfolios are not subject to the same discretization and model misspecification problems as traditional deltahedged portfolios. Within a stochastic volatility framework, I demonstrate that ignoring an option’s gamma can lead to incorrect inference on the magnitude of the volatility risk premium. Using a sample of S&P100 Index and natural gas contracts, empirical tests reveal that the delta–gamma hedged strategy outperforms zero and the degree of overperformance is proportional to the level of volatility.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net