Journal of Risk Model Validation
ISSN:
1753-9579 (print)
1753-9587 (online)
Editor-in-chief: Steve Satchell
![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Point-in-time probability of default term structure models for multiperiod scenario loss projection
. .
Need to know
- A forward looking point-in-time probability of default term structure model is proposed for IFRS9 expected credit loss estimation and CCAR stress testing.
- The model is characterized by a rating level forward looking PD term structure model under the Merton model framework.
- The model is robust, outperforms generally the forward looking rating transition model, and is easy to implement.
Abstract
Rating transition models have been widely used for multiperiod scenario loss projection for Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review (CCAR) stress testing and International Financial Reporting Standard 9 (IFRS 9) expected credit loss estimation. Although the cumulative probability of default (PD) for a rating can be derived by repeatedly applying the migration matrix at each forward scenario sequentially, divergence between the predicted and realized cumulative default rates can be significant, particularly when the predicting horizon is extended. We propose approaches to model the forward PDs directly. The proposed models are structured via a credit index, representing the systematic risk for the portfolio explained by a series of macroeconomic variables, together with the risk sensitivity with respect to the credit index, for each rating and each forward term. We also propose a parameter estimation algorithm based on the maximum likelihood of observing the default frequency for each nondefault rating and each forward term. Our proposed models and approaches are validated on a corporate portfolio, to which a forward PD model and a point-in-time rating transition model are fitted. Both models accurately predict the portfolio quarterly default rate (ie, for a one-term horizon), but the term model in general outperforms the transition model as the predicting horizon increases (eg, for a two-year horizon), due to the fact that the term model is calibrated over a longer horizon. We believe that the proposed models will provide practitioners with a new, robust tool for directly modeling the PD term structure for multiperiod scenario loss projection, for CCAR stress testing and for IFRS 9 expected credit loss estimation.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net