Mean reversion pays, but costs
A mean-reverting financial instrument is optimally traded by buying it when it is sufficiently below the estimated ‘mean level’ and selling it when it is above. In the presence of linear transaction costs, a large amount of value is paid away crossing bid-offers unless one adopts a strategy in the form of a ‘buffer’ through which the price must move before a trade is done. In this article, Richard Martin and Torsten Schöneborn derive the optimal strategy and conclude that for low costs the buffer width is proportional to the cube root of the transaction cost, determining the proportionality constant explicitly
A difficult problem in trading algorithm design is linear transaction costs. This is quite distinct from, and much less analytically tractable than, purely quadratic costs (Garleanu & Pedersen, 2009), and unless very large positions are being traded it is the major source of slippage.
Please click on the link below to read the full version of this article.
Mean reversion pays, but costs
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Trading platforms
Electronic trading of corporate bonds still work in progress
Industry members discuss the growth of electronic trading of corporate bonds
A range of investable indices to meet client needs in alpha and beta generation
Sponsored video: Societe Generale
Japan FSA threshold for trade execution 'extremely high'
Only banks with ¥6tn in derivatives must trade swaps electronically
QIC first Australian buy-side firm to execute on a Sef
Money manager looks to access all liquidity pools
Market hits back at Hong Kong plans to bar retail access to dark pools
SFC proposals to keep retail investors on the lit market come under fire
Korea clearing structure in question after HanMag trading error
Korea trading snafu casts doubt on KRX's default fund structure
Prop shops to rival dealer market-makers on broker Sefs
Impartial access rules for Sefs allow firms to gatecrash interdealer market
Australian dark pool rules shift liquidity back to the lit market
Decline in broker-dealer dark pool volumes after Asic introduces requirements for price improvement