Basel proposals reduce need to sign guaranteed portability agreements

Changes to bank capital rules on CCP exposures remove the need for bank clients to enter into contractual agreements to port trades to other clearing members

pass-on-baton

Revisions to proposed capital rules on central counterparty (CCP) exposures reduce the need for banks that clear via a clearing member to enter into contractual agreements with another dealer, to accept their cleared trades in the event of a default of the original clearing member.

A previous consultation paper, published by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision last December, had stipulated that bank clients that clear via a clearing member can only apply preferential risk weights for

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Switching CCP – How and why?

As uncertainty surrounding Brexit continues and the impacts of Covid-19-driven market volatility are analysed, it is essential for banks and their end-users to understand their clearing options, and how they can achieve greater capital and cross…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here