Mirant to pay $460m to settle California energy crisis claims
Bankrupt Atlanta-based energy marketer Mirant will pay $460 million to California power utilities and public agencies to resolve claims related to the state’s energy crisis in 2000 and 2001. The California utilities and agencies in the settlement were asserting claims against Mirant and its subsidiaries for billions of dollars of undelivered electricity.
The amount will be divided among the parties and any other market participants that choose to opt into the settlement.
The California parties will also receive an unsecured claim of $175 million against MAEM, and DWR will receive an additional unsecured claim of $2.25 million. When Mirant emerges from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, those claims will be compensated on the same basis as other claims against MAEM.
PG&E will receive proceeds of $63 million under Mirant’s plan of reorganisation. Mirant will also either transfer ownership of the partially completed 530-megawatt gas-fired Contra Costa Unit 8 power plant and associated turbines to PG&E; or PG&E will receive an additional amount of up to $85 million.
Mirant and PG&E will also enter into long-term power purchase agreements under which PG&E will dispatch and receive the output of certain Mirant power plants in north California.
The agreement will release Mirant from liability for claims related to all transactions in the western energy markets from January 1, 1998 to July 14, 2003.
The CPUC approved the settlement yesterday. However, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission has not yet approved it, nor have the two respective bankruptcy courts overseeing the Chapter 11 proceedings of Mirant and PG&E.
Mirant said the agreement removes significant financial uncertainty that could have affected its Chapter 11 reorganisation plan, which it is due to file with the Bankruptcy Court by the end of January.
Mirant said it will file its reorganisation plan later this month and plans to emerge from Chapter 11 in mid-2005. It was originally due to file the plan by December 31, but obtained an extension to the deadline – its third such postponement.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Foreign exchange
Will Taiwan lifers ramp up FX hedging amid tariff turmoil?
As TWD remains strong against the US dollar, Taiwanese life insurers are still poised to act
Deutsche Bank takes AutobahnFX on the open road
Proprietary trading platform sets out new workflow-based approach to collaborating with venues
Dealers bullish on Bloomberg chat interface for FX markets
Service expanded its API offering to integrate broker chats into banks’ engines for cash FX pricing late last year
LCH expects to boost deliverable FX clearing with new adds
Onboarding of dealers and link-up with CLS could swell interbank deliverable FX clearing volumes
Does no-hedge strategy stack up for mag seven mavericks?
At Amazon, Meta and Tesla, the lack of FX hedging might raise eyebrows, but isn’t necessarily a losing technique
Amazon, Meta and Tesla reject FX hedging
Risk.net study shows tech giants don’t hedge day-to-day exposures
Intraday FX swaps could signal new dawn for liquidity management
Seedling market could help banks pre-fund payments in near-real time and reduce HQLA requirements
Natixis turns on the taps in flow trading
French bank boosts flow business, balancing structured solutions capabilities