Structured Products Asia: Professional investor definition sparks debate

The question of how to decide whether an investor is a professional and can therefore be a suitable target for more complex structured products was the leading debate at the Structured Products Asia conference, which took place on September 2 in the Renaissance Harbourview Hotel in Hong Kong. Richard Jory reports

lam-4290

If you can describe a structured product in three lines, you understand catastrophic loss or how much you could lose, and you know why you are buying this investment, then you can be a professional investor, at least according to Chak Wong, professor of financial practices at the Chinese University of Hong Kong, speaking on the opening, regulatory panel at the Structured Products Asia conference in Hong Kong on September 2. The distinction is either extremely important, or almost meaningless

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here