Structured Products Americas: some welcome consistency in the complexity debate

Richard Jory reports from the Structured Products Americas conference in Miami

0013

The investment of time and resources by regulators into structured products has been nothing short of astounding, but, despite the progress in the creation of new rules, no progress has been made towards establishing an industry nomenclature that would provide some consistency in the understanding and presentation of the products themselves.

The lack of consistency in nomenclature across the world has been noted, though not acted upon, by the regulators, and the message from Bill Hayden, senior

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here