The Raw Deal

Buyers’ verdict

Marks & Spencer has come under fire for the poor covenant package on its £400 million 10-year deal. The lack of a change of control covenant was particularly unwelcome given the rumours at the time that retail giant Philip Green was sniffing around M&S for a potential acquisition. There was also no negative pledge covenant, so M&S is free to issue bonds in future that are secured and senior to this bond.

The deal was oversubscribed but performed poorly in the aftermarket, trading slightly wide

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here