A covenant for change

A sharp rise in LBO risk - thanks mainly to private equity funds' groaning warchests - has forced credit investors to look to protect themselves by pressurising issuers to include more robust covenant language in their offerings. So does this mean that bondholders are finally winning the battle for improved bond terms? Laurence Neville isn't so sure

pg36-jpg

Investment-grade bondholders have long been poorly protected against event risk. Efforts by the Group of 26 sterling and euro investors to improve covenant protection, first revealed in October 2003 by Credit, achieved little in the way of improvements.

But the leveraged buyout of Danish cleaning services company ISS in April 2005 changed the terms of the debate and underscored the dangers of having no protection in the event of company takeovers. The lack of a change-of-control clause in bond

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here