Rating agencies under fire for conflicts in valuation process

Moody's and S&P methodology flaws could undermine banks' risk management activities

Inconsistencies in the way rating agencies rate different securities could cause problems for banks calculating their risk capital requirements, according to research from Nomura published in June.

Mark Adelson, head of structured finance research at Nomura in New York, says that certain aspects of Standard & Poor's and Moody's valuation procedures may undermine rating consistency and comparability. "Risk management activities will become more complicated and credit derivative trading activities

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here