Amaranth investors should have known risks, says Edhec analyst

Investors in Amaranth, the US hedge fund now preparing to liquidate after taking large losses on natural gas derivatives, should have known that the fund was a risky investment, according to an analyst from France's Edhec business school.

In a paper on the hedge fund's collapse, Hilary Till wrote that the fund's general strategy was "economically defensible" although its positions were far too large for its capital base. The triggering event was a "nine-standard-deviation event" on September 15, an event Till said would have been missed by risk metrics using only recent historical data.

"Investors would not have needed position-level transparency to realise that Amaranth’s energy trading was quite risky," Till wrote, but added that greater transparency would have revealed the potential for liquidity risk.

Amaranth's founder, Nick Maounis, originally hoped to keep the fund going despite its losses, estimated at $6 billion, but announced in a letter to investors on Friday that the fund would be wound up. "Our current intention is to dispose of the remaining positions in the funds' portfolios in an orderly fashion over time," he wrote.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here