Rating agency concerned by self-referenced credit derivatives

Fitch Ratings said it expects to make “appropriate adjustments to liquidity and capital measures” for any company that purchases a self-referenced credit derivative.

Self-referenced credit-linked notes (CLN) involve a company selling protection on itself by purchasing a security that includes an embedded credit default swap (CDS), with the company as the protection seller and the reference entity.

Fitch outlined its concerns in a report co-authored by analysts Roger Merritt, Ian Linnell and Robert Grossman, released today. According to Merritt, the rating agency’s primary concern is that CLNs and similar structured notes are correlated 100% to the credit profile of the company. "Liquidity and capital resources may be materially tied to a financial asset that has diminishing value at exactly the wrong time, when the company is under financial stress," said New York-based Merritt.

Companies enter into self-referenced credit derivative transactions for a variety of reasons, including regulatory arbitrage. Self-referenced CLNs typically offer higher returns than similarly rated securities, particularly if a company is thinly traded in the single-name CDS market and demand for protection buying exceeds demand for protection selling.

According to Fitch, investment in a self-referenced CLN has the potential to accelerate a company’s financial decline. Credit derivatives dealers Risk spoke to said this type of transaction has become increasingly common over the past two years. CLNs recently hit the headlines when it emerged that bankrupt Italian dairy company Parmalat had bought self-referenced notes with a notional value of tens of millions of pounds sterling.

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here