Reason for hope

One disappointing aspect of the Basel II deliberations has been the lack of any proposed change in the treatment of counterparty credit exposures. David Rowe argues that recent dialogue between the Basel Committee and industry representatives offers hope for an important improvement in this area

riskanalysis-gif

The original Basel I Accord was initiated in the mid-1980s just as long-dated derivatives were emerging as an important risk management tool. It was recognised that these contracts gave rise to credit exposure of indefinite future magnitude on the books of market-makers. At the time, such exposure was material but comparatively small. This, combined with the perceived urgency in implementing the Accord, resulted in the simple (I might say simplistic) mark-to-market plus add-on

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here