An aversion to variance

As volatility spiked in late 2008, variance swaps contributed to huge bank losses, particularly in single stocks. Some dealers have now stopped quoting single-stock variance swaps, while activity in the broader market has been scaled back. Mark Pengelly reports

p63-selbert-gif

Variance swaps have proven tricky beasts to risk manage. These instruments grant investors a payout equal to the difference between realised variance and a pre-agreed strike level, times the vega notional. But because variance is the square of volatility, an unpredictable trading environment can have dramatic effects on variance positions. As a consequence, bad bets on variance have led to significant losses for users in the past. Towards the end of 2008, they struck once again. After September

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

What gold's rise means for rates, equities

It has been several years since we have seen volatility in gold. An increase in gold volatility can typically be associated with a change in sentiment and investor behavior. The precious metal has surged this year on increased demand for safe haven…

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here