Like your CSA dirty? It’ll cost more

Buy-side firms have to pay up if they want to post corporate bonds to their dealers, but prices vary

Credit: Risk.net montage

As dealers see it, collateral agreements sit on a continuum of cleanliness. A spectrum of spotlessness. An increasing number of pension funds and insurers are now trotting down to the grubbier end of that path – accepting costs that have become a growing point of difference and debate.

Banks favour credit support annexes (CSAs) in which counterparties only post cash to each other – super-helpful to any derivatives dealer, because cash is fungible, allowing incoming collateral to be used for

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here