
Podcast: Barclays’ Ben Burnett on how banks can implement HVA
New valuation adjustment may lead to more efficient management of derivatives books

In this episode of Quantcast, Ben Burnett, a director of the XVA quant team at Barclays, discusses the development and application of a hedging valuation adjustment (HVA) to derivatives transactions.
HVA measures the impact of transaction costs on the value of a derivatives book. Burnett introduced the concept and explained how to calculate it in a paper published in Risk.net in February.
His latest paper, co-written with Barclays colleague Ieuan Williams, sets out a framework for consistently calculating HVA alongside other derivatives valuation adjustments (XVAs).
Banks’ approaches to dealing with the transaction costs associated with hedging derivatives books are somewhat ad hoc. A rigorous calculation may make a big difference. Quantifying future transaction costs will allow banks to manage these more effectively. And pricing these costs upfront will give banks a better understanding of the profitability of a trade, allowing them to make more informed decisions about whether to enter into it in the first place.
Burnett’s research shows HVA is comparable in size to that of other valuation adjustments and can amount to as much as CVA. If his analysis is any indication, it could soon become a staple of XVA desks.
Index:
00:00 What is HVA?
03:33 How is it calculated?
07:20 Existing approaches to calculating transaction costs
09:45 The advantages of quantifying HVA
12:05 The cross-gamma effect and its impact on XVA desks
16:50 Interaction of HVA with other valuation adjustments
21:15 Close-out aspect that arises with HVA
23:30 What’s left to research about HVA?
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Cutting Edge
The WWR in the tail: a Monte Carlo framework for CCR stress testing
A methodology to compute stressed exposures based on a Gaussian copula and mixture distributions is introduced
Estimating mean reversions in interest rate models
The speed of factors’ mean reversion in rate models is estimated
Auto-encoding term-structure models
An arbitrage-free low-dimensionality interest rate model is presented
The relativity of the fractional Gamma Clock
Bank of America quant expands his Gamma Clock model with a fractional Brownian motion
A market-making model for an options portfolio
Vladimir Lucic and Alex Tse fill a glaring gap in European-style derivatives modelling
Option market-making and vol arbitrage
The agent’s view is factored in to a realised-vs-implied vol model
Degree of influence 2024: volatility and credit risk keep quants alert
Quantum-based models and machine learning also contributed to Cutting Edge’s output
Overcoming Markowitz’s instability with hierarchical risk parity
Portfolio optimisation via HRP provides stable and robust weight estimates