
BAML exec fears ‘systemic risk’ if margin issue not resolved
Regulators urged to make swift decision on exempting small end-users

Failure to exempt nearly 1,000 end-users from posting and receiving initial margin from 2020 could introduce unnecessary systemic risk into the over-the-counter derivatives market, according to a senior executive at Bank of America Merrill Lynch.
“[This issue is] another systemic risk that could be caused by the onerous implementation and cost [of the rules],” said Tomo Kodama, a managing director in counterparty portfolio management at BAML, speaking at an event hosted by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association in New York on October 4.
Darcy Bradbury, an Isda board member and managing director at hedge fund DE Shaw, who was also speaking at the event, said she was concerned smaller buy-side firms would find it difficult to access certain derivatives markets should regulators not act.
“The thing I’m worried about as well is not just the implementation, it’s what this means for the market overall. In the same way that firms are finding their access to clearing services is being rationed because of cost, there could be the same impact in this market, where it just becomes too expensive for dealers,” she said.
The non-cleared margin rules, which require covered parties to a new trade to post initial margin to a custodian from the outset, is being phased in over a five-year period. Starting in September 2016, the phase-ins to-date have predominantly affected large banks, though Brevan Howard became the first buy-side firm to be caught when the third phase came into effect last month. So far, just 37 firms have been affected by the rules, according to Isda chief executive Scott O’Malia.
The industry fears that the fifth phase, due to come into effect in 2020, will capture significantly more.
An analysis of more than 16,000 legal counterparties, led by Isda, shows that around 1,100 buy-side firms would be caught in the final phase of implementation – the so-called initial margin “big bang” – when the aggregate average notional amount threshold is scheduled to plummet from $750 billion to just $8 billion.
Firms subject to the initial margin regime need only post or collect margin when their counterparty exposure exceeds a separate exchange threshold of $50 million.
Last month, a group of trade bodies, including Isda, asked global regulators to raise the threshold at which counterparties must comply with the final wave, which would permanently exempt 992 firms. BAML’s Kodama called for regulators to make a swift decision.
“We need to have [clarity] very soon,” he said. “All the work we have to do is going to take a lot of time. It will be very hard for the industry to respond to any relief we get if that’s announced in 2020 [by regulators]. Even if that relief is [in] January 2020, it’s just too late.”
Another major worry concerns the operational task of getting ready for the rules. Kodama said it took the largest firms roughly two years to set up the correct infrastructure to comply, so with just two years to go, end-users are not currently paying enough attention to this impending issue. He also predicted that this implementation would be more complicated than the variation margin deadline in 2017.
“Awareness of the effort required by many buy-side firms is not where it needs to be. I think some of them will wait until 2020, while more sophisticated firms are working on setting up their infrastructure now. Some firms are waiting for a silver bullet, such as a vendor coming along and magically doing all of this for them,” he said.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Markets
For US Treasury algos, dealers get with the program
Four banks now offer execution algos on Bloomberg, with plans to go further, faster
Snowballs show signs of life amid China stock rebound
A-share jump and expiries drive new issuance, but dealers say regulations are depressing volumes
Indonesian CCP seeks thumbs-up from US, UK and Japan
Growing foreign bank interest pushes IDClear to pursue regulatory approval overseas
Corporates hamstrung in response to FX volatility
Restrictions around hedging programmes leave US firms struggling to adapt to dollar weakness
Commodity price insurance, an alternative to swaps?
ChAI founder eyes metals and power for expansion after selling first hedges for recycled materials
Estimating mean reversions in interest rate models
The speed of factors’ mean reversion in rate models is estimated
Shifting credit markets could push SRT pricing wider
Rising volatility may force issuers to adjust pricing in line with broader credit spread trends
Credit markets brace for Trump tariffs fallout
Traders have largely shrugged off the threat of global trade wars, but worries remain about economic weakness