FVA should be included in derivatives pricing, say survey respondents

Nearly two thirds of survey respondents disagree with Hull and White’s argument that funding valuation adjustment should be ignored

battle

Funding valuation adjustment (FVA) should be included in derivatives pricing, according to a majority of Risk.net readers – a view that conflicts with academics John Hull and Alan White, who feel funding costs should be ignored.

The issue burst into life earlier this year, when Hull and White contributed an article to Risk that argued traders should disregard FVA when making trading decisions. Some other academics agreed – if the cost of funding is taken into account, then it would essentially

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here