Podcast: Zetocha on mini-futures (not those) and illiquid options
Julius Baer equity quant revels in solving problems for the trading desk
Valer Zetocha’s job as head of quantitative services for equity and foreign exchange at Julius Baer occasionally takes him to some of the more remote corners of the market.
Most recently, he was asked to devise a pricing methodology for so-called mini-futures. While most will be familiar with the popular e-mini futures listed by CME, mini-futures are a type of leveraged derivative, with an embedded barrier that effectively works like a stop loss mechanism. They are mostly traded in Germany, as well as Switzerland.
Dealers guarantee the barrier in the contract, and could be exposed to significant hedging losses in the event of large and sudden price moves. This risk is particularly elevated when company earnings or important economic data – such as inflation prints – are released.
They may not be the most glamorous or widely traded product, but mini-futures present real problems for dealers. Getting the pricing wrong can be extremely costly. “If there’s mispricing, you may be looking at losses of the order of the whole year of P&L for that particular underlying,” says Zetocha.
Zetocha’s solution, published in Risk.net in January, deals with the gap risk in mini-futures. Because the gap risk of long mini-futures resembles that of deep out-of-the-money put options, they can be priced similarly. “The solution is taking the periodic perpetual nature of the mini-future and writing a valuation equation for the gap risk” in order to estimate the probability and the magnitude of the negative P&L when the spot drops through the barrier.
In this podcast, Zetocha also discusses his solution for building the volatility surface of options written on illiquid assets, or liquid options with some maturities or strikes that are scarcely traded, which was published in Risk.net last October.
This is another very common problem for dealers that want to offer a price on those options without exposing themselves to the risk of being arbitraged by other dealers.
Zetocha’s method is an algorithm that fills in the gaps where price and volatility metrics are not available. In essence, it starts by bootstrapping the volatility levels from the liquid strikes and then applies a formula designed to optimise certain metrics in a statistical distribution to fill in the data gaps.
Index
00:00 Intro and the mini-futures market
06:54 Mini-futures pricing and risk management
18:43 A pricing model that accounts for gap risk
23:00 Volatility surfaces and illiquid strikes
28:32 Completing the volatility surface
35:17 How a quant finance project gets started
To hear the full interview, listen in the player above, or download. Future podcasts in our Quantcast series will be uploaded to Risk.net. You can also visit the main page here to access all tracks, or go to the iTunes store, Spotify or Google Podcasts to listen and subscribe.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Cutting Edge
Choosing trading strategies using importance sampling
The sampling technique is more efficient than A-B testing at comparing decision rules
A comparison of FX fixing methodologies
FX fixing outcomes are mostly driven by length of calculation window
Quantum cognition machine learning: financial forecasting
A new paradigm for training machine learning algorithms based on quantum cognition is presented
Backtesting correlated quantities
A technique to decorrelate samples and reach higher discriminatory power is presented
A hard exit threshold strategy for market-makers
A closed-form solution to derive optimal stop-loss and profit-taking levels is presented
Pricing share buy-backs: an alternative to optimal control
A new method applies optimised heuristic strategies to maximise share buy-back contracts’ value
CVA sensitivities, hedging and risk
A probabilistic machine learning approach to CVA calculations is proposed
Podcast: Alvaro Cartea on collusion within trading algos
Oxford-Man Institute director worries ML-based trading could have anti-competitive effects