Custody Risk July–September 2013

A question of responsibility

ofc-cr98-cover

When in 2009 proposals emerged from European legislators to saddle custodians with the responsibility to restore lost assets from non-Ucits collective investment schemes held in their safekeeping, the industry responded with a furious lobbying effort.

But it was to no avail. The alternative investment fund managers directive (AIFMD) retained the contentious requirement in what is probably one of the most hotly debated pieces of financial regulation ever to emerge from the EU – issued by

Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.

To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe

You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.

Sorry, our subscription options are not loading right now

Please try again later. Get in touch with our customer services team if this issue persists.

New to Risk.net? View our subscription options

Most read articles loading...

You need to sign in to use this feature. If you don’t have a Risk.net account, please register for a trial.

Sign in
You are currently on corporate access.

To use this feature you will need an individual account. If you have one already please sign in.

Sign in.

Alternatively you can request an individual account here