![Risk.net](https://www.risk.net/sites/default/files/styles/print_logo/public/2018-09/print-logo.png?itok=1TpHrpuP)
Spectron and Braemar join forces for freight desk
Energy broker Spectron and ship broker Braemar Seascope have formed a partnership called Braemar Spectron, to broker forward freight agreements (FFAs) concentrating initially on dry freight in London.
Braemar’s established business is on the physical side of the shipping market. It hopes to benefit from Spectron’s derivatives background to quickly establish a presence in the FFA market. Quentin Soanes, joint managing director at Braemar Seascope, believes the forward freight broking market had a lot of room for improvement: “The skill level in FFAs has not been brilliant. With this joint venture, we will bring a depth of knowledge to the market.”
Richard Frape, director of market services at Spectron, said freight futures are gaining a profile in the energy markets. “The strength we have comes from the combination of Braemar's enormous shipping experience on the physical side and our extensive experience of derivatives, via both voice and electronic broking platforms," he said.
Braemar Spectron’s rivals, including Clarkson Securities and SSY Futures, already have a presence in FFA broking. And they are seeking to expand their positions in the market. SSY Futures has just announced it will launch freight spread swaps, which will allow traders to take positions on the spread between different FFA contracts.
Philippe van den Abeele, managing director at Clarkson Securities, did not see Braemar Spectron as a major threat: “We’ve been doing FFAs since 1992 in the dry market and 1995 in the tanker market. We have the right formula because we were there from the beginning,” he said. He also dismissed SSY Futures’ suggestion that the freight spread swap was innovative: “It is the biggest damp squib I’ve seen for years in the FFA market. We’ve been trading it for 10 years.” He added that Clarkson Securities had about 25% of the dry market and 20% of the tanker market, making it one of the largest participants.
The physical shipping market uses freight derivatives, based on different shipping routes, to hedge their shipping requirements. The volume and volatility of the freight market have risen sharply in the past few years, leading to growing demand for FFAs.
Only users who have a paid subscription or are part of a corporate subscription are able to print or copy content.
To access these options, along with all other subscription benefits, please contact info@risk.net or view our subscription options here: http://subscriptions.risk.net/subscribe
You are currently unable to print this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
You are currently unable to copy this content. Please contact info@risk.net to find out more.
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (point 2.4), printing is limited to a single copy.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
Copyright Infopro Digital Limited. All rights reserved.
You may share this content using our article tools. As outlined in our terms and conditions, https://www.infopro-digital.com/terms-and-conditions/subscriptions/ (clause 2.4), an Authorised User may only make one copy of the materials for their own personal use. You must also comply with the restrictions in clause 2.5.
If you would like to purchase additional rights please email info@risk.net
More on Energy
ETRM systems 2024: market update and vendor landscape
This Chartis report evaluates energy trading and risk management systems that provide front-to-back, asset class-specific and geography-specific coverage, and considers the full energy trade lifecycle
CTRM systems 2024: market update and vendor landscape
A Chartis report on commodity trading and risk management systems that considers its different applications and addresses the market and vendor dynamics to determine the long-term and structural impacts of the overarching market evolution on the…
Energy Risk Commodity Rankings 2024: markets buffeted by geopolitics and economic woes
Winners of the 2024 Commodity Rankings steeled clients to navigate competing forces
Chartis Energy50
The latest iteration of Chartis’ Energy50 ranking
Energy trade surveillance solutions 2023: market and vendor landscape
The market for energy trading surveillance solutions, though small, is expanding as specialist vendors emerge, catering to diverse geographies and market specifics. These vendors, which originate from various sectors, contribute further to the market’s…
Achieving net zero with carbon offsets: best practices and what to avoid
A survey by Risk.net and ION Commodities found that firms are wary of using carbon offsets in their net-zero strategies. While this is understandable, given the reputational risk of many offset projects, it is likely to be extremely difficult and more…
Chartis Energy50 2023
The latest iteration of Chartis' Energy50 2023 ranking and report considers the key issues in today’s energy space, and assesses the vendors operating within it
ION Commodities: spotlight on risk management trends
Energy Risk Software Rankings and awards winner’s interview: ION Commodities